a footnote to something else
an excerpt from an argument I'm having w/ my second reader:
look what I am saying with lability is basically simple and basically stupid:
that the subject is not just always going booooooo qualia I AM SO ALOOOOOOOOOONE because of the Kantian etc problem of qualia and the subject's inability to really know whether "red" is the same "red" for others because it is so TRAPPED IN ITS LONELY SELF THANK GOD THERE IS A GOD a logos to gather up the fragments of the world and transcend my little selfhood and provide the unity of perception that will make it all make sense
what I am saying is that that ^^^^^ might be alienation
and one could even think of this alienation as applying to things that are somehow static--a rose is a rose is a rose
RED RED RED RED RED RED RED
a fucking square that's a fucking square and you can kick it
but what I'm calling lability is about
booo qualia I FEEL LIKE I CAN'T KNOW THOSE THINGS those people anything but my own perspective
OH SHIT IT CHANGED
OH SHIT the rose died
OH SHIT I'M DRINKING ROSEHIP TEA
oh shit I kicked a square
and it broke
and now part of it looks like a circle
and my foot hurts
but I still don't know anything about what could happen
or how to talk about it
or what it could mean for you
or what that rose really is









